“You’ve Made Yourself Unhappy”

I stumbled across an article via Twitter, with what seemed like a pretty run-of-the-mill intro: “re-setting your internal rule for happiness”. It opens with a similarly bland headline: “How to Be Happy at Work”. However, from there it goes downhill pretty quickly:

If you’re unhappy at work–or anywhere else, for that matter–it’s because you’ve made yourself unhappy. There’s an easy way to change that.

– “How to Be Happy at Work” by Geoffrey James

Oh boy. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, let’s keep going.

[A] saleswoman once told me: When you’re unhappy, it’s because you’ve decided to be unhappy.

Maybe it wasn’t a conscious decision; maybe it crept up on you while you weren’t looking–but it was a decision nonetheless. And that’s good news, because you can decide instead to be happy. You just need to understand how and why you make the decisions.

(emphasis mine)

Sad Keanu sculpture

[via]

The article goes on to elaborate on a few simple rules you can use to essentially “snap out of it”. So let me get this straight. Your unhappiness is directly a result of your own decisions, whether you know it or not, and all you have to do to “snap out of it” is to essentially think harder.

I don’t often swear, and I almost never do so online, so let me say this very clearly: fuck you, Mr. James.

Certainly there are things in life that we do to ourselves that lead to our own unhappiness.

  • We can take or stay in jobs we dislike (usually if not always out of necessity).
  • We can stay in relationships that aren’t healthy for us.
  • We can make plenty of poor decisions that ultimately make us unhappy with ourselves (gaining weight, etc).

And yes, I agree with the premise that sometimes such things can be fixed by essentially trying harder.

  • We can quit jobs we hate – if you’re financially able to survive without a steady income in an unpredictable economic climate.
  • We can leave relationships – if you’re prepared to deal with the emotional ride that involves, not even counting the possibility of family or financial disruption.
  • We can diet and exercise to drop excess weight – if you’re physically able and have the means to eat properly.

But other things aren’t so neatly within our realm of control. We can’t always make people stop harassing us. We can’t always control other people’s behaviors. And we can’t always alter our personality or brain chemistry to just be happier. Some of us just aren’t wired that way. Depression is a very serious and very real disorder, and it’s finally starting to lose some of the stigma associated with it.

Related:
The Fight Goes On” by Jenny Lawson, aka The Bloggess;
Adventures in Depression” by Allie Brosh of Hyperbole and a Half.

So, Geoff—can I call you Geoff? Great—while I understand your article was probably meant to be a snappy feel-good write-up on the power of positive thinking and how you too can achieve your dreams, the rest of us would like to request that you perhaps leave the discussions of mental health to those actually qualified to contribute.

Telling people that unhappiness is something they can essentially “snap out of” is like telling them their mangled hand is all in their head.

To your dog, you are a god

Whenever the topic of religion comes up, I generally say I’m agnostic. Religion by definition depends on faith rather than hard facts, which my naturally skeptical personality isn’t particularly willing to accept.

Zach Weinersmith has a great post today about the apparent dichotomy of labels like “atheist” vs “agnostic”:

I felt the need to oppose this simple dichotomy that people seem to believe in. “Do you believe in God” is not actually a question at all, so it doesn’t warrant a system of nomenclature being defined around it. Thus the question should not be “Do you believe in God?” It should be “Which gods do you believe in?”

I like to say that it would surprise me less to discover there was a creator god than to discover astrology is true. That is, to find out there is some sort of deity with certain parameters doesn’t seem impossible to me.

On Agnosticism vs. Atheism” by Zack Weinersmith

Personally, ‘agnostic’ has been a convenient label; people tend to understand it without the need to go into a ten-minute discussion defining your stance.

I believe it’s possible for a deity to exist, though perhaps unlikely. It seems more likely that there exists some sort of being with abilities beyond our current understanding of the universe. Such a being would easily be taken for a god by lesser species; sort of an equivalent of Clarke’s Third Law:

Any sufficiently advanced [consciousness] is indistinguishable from [a god].

Dogs presumably have no understanding of electrons, sound waves or circuitboards, so when you turn on the lights by clapping, certainly you appear to have godlike powers. To you it’s a simple act, to the dog it’s supernatural.

Zack’s comment about “a deity with certain parameters” is what really caught me. Is there any real difference between a god and a being with “powers” beyond our understanding?

Easily switch between Amazon and Goodreads

I’m a big fan of Goodreads.com for maintaining a list of what I want to read.

Goodreads just recently gave up on using Amazon for its data source, but I wanted a dead-simple way to switch between the two sites for any given book I’m viewing. There didn’t seem to be anything out there, so I quickly threw together a javascript bookmarklet to switch between Amazon and Goodreads.

1
javascript:u=location.href;if(u.match(/https?:\/\/(www\.)?amazon\./)!==null){var m=document.body.innerHTML.match(/ISBN-\d{2}:<[^>]+> ([0-9]{9,13})/);if(m!==null){location.href='http://goodreads.com/search?query='+m[1];}}else if(u.match(/https?:\/\/(www\.)?goodreads\./)!==null){var metas=document.getElementsByTagName('meta');for(var i in metas){var m=metas[i];if(m.getAttribute('property')=='good_reads:isbn'){location.href='http://amazon.com/dp/'+m.getAttribute('content');};};}else{void(0);}

Just drag this button to your bookmarks toolbar: Switch Amazon/Goodreads

It’s certainly not perfect or even efficient, but it does the job for me so I wanted to share. I put it in a public gist on GitHub, so please feel free to improve it as you see fit.

Facebook engineers did not build a better version of Google

This effort from some engineers at Facebook, Twitter and MySpace has gotten some attention lately. This article from Business Insider gives a quick intro for the unfamiliar:

Earlier this month, Google launched an optional feature called “Search plus your world.” It integrates personalized content from social networks into Google search results.

Only, search plus your world doesn’t include any content from Twitter, Facebook, or MySpace – the biggest social networks out there.

It does, however, include lots of content from Google’s social network, Google Plus.

Some engineers at Twitter, Facebook, and MySpace think this is unfair to users – and to demonstrate why, they’ve created a modified version of Google, which you can access on a site called Focusontheuser.org.

– “Facebook Engineers Built A Way Better Version Of Google

Except that’s completely misleading. They didn’t build a better version of Google. They built a Javascript bookmarklet that takes Google’s own SERPs and modifies them to swap in somewhat different (and hopefully more relevant) results than Google serves by default.

That may be a semantic difference, but it’s an important distinction. They didn’t create a brand new search engine, they created a way to take Google’s own inconsistent search behavior and combine them into a better end result, assuming that you the user choose to drag their bookmarklet into place and then remember to use it once you’ve already done a Google search.

Maybe no one is actually confused by this difference, but it seems irresponsible for news sites to be reporting it this way.

A Letter to my Representatives

Regarding SOPA/PIPA:

Don’t vote for or against this bill because of your political views. Vote against this bill because, with all due respect, and for lack of a better phrase, it’s none of your business.

Your duty, as a representative to the people, is to give voice to your people, not lobbyists and interest groups. Represent me, your constituent. Represent your other constituents. Vote against the restriction of liberty, because that is the very essence of your elected position.

– @sawaboof: “A Letter to My Representatives

*slow clap*

slow clap